Thursday, May 1, 2014

Does Evil Disprove God?

The real question has been most famously stated by Epicurus:
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - See more at: http://americanvision.org/7989/epicurus-problem-of-evil/#sthash.nKV5ovLw.ZuleLuw4.dpuf
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
Essentially he says, "If God wants to and can abolish evil, but then God is evil. If God cannot and is unwilling to abolish evil, then He is not God." Sounds like he puts Christians in between a rock and a hard place. According to Epicurus, evil disproves God's goodness, if not His existence entirely.

This is a difficult subject and I, in no way, want to portray that I have all of this figured out and I know all that there is to know about the depths and mysteries of our eternal God. However, I do believe that understanding that evil does not diminish God of any glory is possible and necessary. That's where I want to lead us today. The question stands "Does evil disprove God?" My answer is an emphatic no. Here's why:

Evil Proves God's Existence

Epicurus was attempting to disprove God's existence in his question. He believed that since evil existed, a good God could not. My question to him, and to all others who hold his view, is "how do you know evil exists?" How can you honestly say what is evil? By what standard are you holding these "evil" people to? Are you a standard in of yourself or do you have a standard outside of you? If you are your standard, why can't they be their own standard? If they feel like blowing up people for the sake of their god is righteous, who are you to say other wise?

C.S. Lewis can help us here:
My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I gotten this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself in such violent reaction against it? A man feels wet when he falls into water, because man is not a water animal: a fish would not feel wet.
Lewis calls to our attention that there must be an objective moral standard that we all know. When we reject that moral standard, that is evil. Lewis' conclusion is that God is that objective moral standard. Without God (who is the standard of good, righteousness, fairness, justice, etc.) we would not have anything to define what is right and what is wrong. So when we look at evil in the face, that indignation we feel, is because God has given us an objective moral standard to know what is good and what is evil.

On the flip-side of this coin, there is the problem of good. If an atheist feels that evil disproves God, the good disproves the atheist. Why would there ever be anything morally good in a universe that had happened by chance? Why would there be love, selflessness, and patience? There wouldn't.

Evil Proves God Wants Us to Love Him

Think about this for a second with me: if I program a robot to love me, does it really love me? Of course not. The same goes for God and His creation of us. God created mankind with free will. We get to choose whether we love God or not. Without that choice, love would not be real. If we did not have free will, nothing on this earth would be real. We could not be responsible for good or evil, but we are. Here is another helpful piece from C.S. Lewis:
God created things which had free will. That means creatures which can go wrong or right. Some people think they can imagine a creature which was free but had no possibility of going wrong, but I can't. If a thing is free to be good it's also free to be bad. And free will is what has made evil possible. Why, then, did God give them free will? Because free will, though it makes evil possible, is also the only thing that makes possible any love or goodness or joy worth having.
Love of God is the most ultimate virtue a human being can possess. This must be a real love, not a manufactured love. Love is not forced by God, though I believe He can strongly persuade us, but that's another blog.

Another point that can be derived from this point is that God did not create evil, He merely created the possibility. Satan was supposedly the first to "create" evil by acting it out. Adam and Eve were the first humans to "create" evil. God is never blamed in the Bible for creating evil, Satan and man are.

Evil is Used by God for Good

This isn't a point about evil disproving God's existence as much as it is evil disproving God's goodness. Even though there is evil in this world, God is greater than evil.

You may have heard of the story of Joseph. It is a long one (Genesis 37-50), so I won't go over the whole story in detail. Looking at the things that went wrong in his life is most beneficial for our discussion.
  • sold into slavery by his brothers because of their jealousy
  • wrongly put in prison for allegedly raping an officer's wife
  • forgotten in prison by a friend for two years 
After all of this, Pharaoh gave Joseph great power in the land of Egypt because he could interpret Pharaoh's dreams. One of his dreams was that there would be great prosperity in the land for seven years and then great famine for seven years. Joseph was in charge of making sure there was enough food for everyone.

His brothers eventually come to Egypt for food, and after many schemes to get his whole family there, they finally come. His brothers thought they would hate them and he would want to return all the evil they had done to him. But Joseph replied with this statement, "“Do not fear, for am I in the place of God? As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today" (Gen. 50:19-20). 

What people mean for evil in this world, God means for good. Another verse that brings this reality to the forefront is Romans 8:28: "And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good for those who are called according to his purpose." God is not ruled by evil, but He rules it. 

I can't answer why things happen the way they do sometimes, but I know God is good and that He can change any evil into good. 
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - See more at: http://americanvision.org/7989/epicurus-problem-of-evil/#sthash.nKV5ovLw.ZuleLuw4.dpuf
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - See more at: http://americanvision.org/7989/epicurus-problem-of-evil/#sthash.nKV5ovLw.ZuleLuw4.dpuf
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - See more at: http://americanvision.org/7989/epicurus-problem-of-evil/#sthash.nKV5ovLw.ZuleLuw4.dpuf
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - See more at: http://americanvision.org/7989/epicurus-problem-of-evil/#sthash.nKV5ovLw.ZuleLuw4.dpuf

Thursday, April 17, 2014

18 Ways to Know If You Are Lukewarm


Most everyone knows the haunting verse in Revelation 3:16: So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth.

That's a scary verse to me. One reason is because no one knows exactly what Jesus means. I do not want to be rejected by Jesus. I know I am only accepted by His sacrifice that He made, but (allow me to be honest for a second) I have been kind of in a slump. I felt like I needed a good life examination. 

I turned to a book that I knew would give me a pretty good gauge of where I am at: Crazy Love by Francis Chan. Needless to say I have done my soul searching for the day. I think this same exam can help many others. The following is directly out of Chapter 4 of Crazy Love entitled "The Profile of the Lukewarm."

So here are Chan's 18 ways to know if you are lukewarm:

1) Lukewarm people attend church fairly regularly. It is what is expected of them, what they believe "good Christians" do, so they go.

And so the Lord says, "These people say they are mine. They honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. And their worship of me is nothing but man-made rules learned by rote. Isaiah 29:13

2) Lukewarm people give money to charity and to the church...as long as it doesn't impinge on their standard of living. If they have a little extra and it is easy and safe to give, they do so. After all, God loves a cheerful giver, right?

But King David said to Ornan, “No, but I will buy them for the full price. I will not take for the LORD what is yours, nor offer burnt offerings that cost me nothing.” 1 Chronicles 21:24

And He looked up and saw the rich putting their gifts into the treasury. And He saw a poor widow putting in two small copper coins. And He said, “Truly I say to you, this poor widow put in more than all of them; for they all out of their surplus put into the offering; but she out of her poverty put in all that she had to live on.”  Luke 21:1-4

3) Lukewarm people tend to choose what is popular over what is right when they are in conflict. They desire to fit in both at church and outside of church; they care more about what people think of their actions (like church attendance and giving) than what God thinks of their heart and lives.

Woe to you, when all people speak well of you, for so their fathers did to the false prophets. 
Luke 6:26

I know your works. You have the reputation of being alive, but you are dead. Revelation 3:1

But they do all their deeds to be noticed by men; for they broaden their phylacteries and lengthen the tassels of their garments. “They love the place of honor at banquets and the chief seats in the synagogues, and respectful greetings in the market places, and being called Rabbi by men.
 Matthew 23:5-7

4) Lukewarm people don't really want to be saved from their sin; they want only to be saved from the penalty of their sin. They don't genuinely hate sin and aren't truly sorry for it; they're merely sorry because God is going to punish them. Lukewarm people don't really believe that this new life Jesus offers is better than the old sinful one.

The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly. John 10:10

What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin so that grace may increase? May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it? Romans 6:1-2

5) Lukewarm people are moved by stories about people who do radical things for Christ, yet they do not act. They assume such action is for "extreme" Christians, not average ones. Lukewarm people call "radical" what Jesus expected of all His followers.

But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves. James 1:22

So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin. James 4:17

“But what do you think? A man had two sons, and he came to the first and said, ‘Son, go work today in the vineyard.’ “And he answered, ‘I will not’; but afterward he regretted it and went. “The man came to the second and said the same thing; and he answered, ‘I will, sir’; but he did not go. “Which of the two did the will of his father?” They said, “The first.” Matthew 21:28-31

6) Lukewarm people rarely share their faith with their neighbors, coworkers, or friends. They do not want to be rejected, not do they want to make people uncomfortable by talking about private issues like religion.

 “Therefore everyone who confesses Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father who is in heaven. “But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven. Matthew 10:32-33

7) Lukewarm people gauge their morality or "goodness" by comparing themselves to the secular world. They feel satisfied that while they aren't as hard-core for Jesus as so-and-so, they are nowhere as horrible as the guy down the street.   

The Pharisee stood and was praying this to himself: ‘God, I thank You that I am not like other people: swindlers, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. ‘I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I get.’ Luke 18:11-12

8) Lukewarm people say they love Jesus, and He is, indeed, a part of their lives. But only a part. They give Him a section of their lives, their money, and their thoughts, but He isn't allowed to control their lives.

As they were going along the road, someone said to Him, “I will follow You wherever You go.” And Jesus said to him, “The foxes have holes and the birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head.” And He said to another, “Follow Me.” But he said, “Lord, permit me first to go and bury my father.” But He said to him, “Allow the dead to bury their own dead; but as for you, go and proclaim everywhere the kingdom of God.” Another also said, “I will follow You, Lord; but first permit me to say good-bye to those at home.” But Jesus said to him, “No one, after putting his hand to the plow and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.” Luke 9:57-62

9) Lukewarm people love God, but they do not love Him with all their heart, soul, and strength. They would be quick to assure you that they try to love God that much, but that sort of total devotion isn't really possible for the average person; it's only for pastors and missionaries and radicals.

 And He said to him, “ ‘YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND.’ “This is the great and foremost commandment. “The second is like it, ‘YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.’ Matthew 22:37-38

10) Lukewarm people love others but do not seek to love others as much as they love themselves. Their love of others is typically focused on those who love them in return, like family, friends, and other people they know and connect with. There is little love left over for those who cannot love them back, much less for those who intentionally slight them, whose kids are better athletes than theirs, or with whom conversations are awkward or uncomfortable. Their love is highly conditional and very selective, and generally comes with strings attached.

“You have heard that it was said, ‘YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR and hate your enemy.’ “But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. “For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? “If you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? Matthew 5:43-47

And He also went on to say to the one who had invited Him, “When you give a luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, otherwise they may also invite you in return and that will be your repayment. “But when you give a reception, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, since they do not have the means to repay you; for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous.” Luke 14:12-14

11) Lukewarm people will serve God and others, but there are limits to how far they will go or how much time, money, and energy they are willing to give.

And he said, “All these things I have kept from my youth.” When Jesus heard this, He said to him, “One thing you still lack; sell all that you possess and distribute it to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.” But when he had heard these things, he became very sad, for he was extremely rich. And Jesus looked at him and said, “How hard it is for those who are wealthy to enter the kingdom of God! “For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” Luke 18:21-25

12) Lukewarm people think about life on earth much more often than eternity in heaven. Daily life is mostly focused on today's to-do list, this week's schedule, and next month's vacation. Rarely, if even, do they intently consider the life to come. Regarding this, C.S. Lewis writes, "If you read history you will find that the Christians who did most for the present world were precisely those who thought most of the next. It is since Christians have largely ceased to think of the other world that they have become so ineffective in this."

For many walk, of whom I often told you, and now tell you even weeping, that they are enemies of the cross of Christ, whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things. For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ... Philippians 3:18-20

Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth. Colossians 3:2

13) Lukewarm people are thankful for their luxuries and comforts, and rarely consider trying to give as much as possible to the poor. They are quick to point out, "Jesus never said money is the root of all evil, only that the love of money is." Untold numbers of lukewarm people feel "called" to minister to the rich; very few feel "called" to minister to the poor.

Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’ Matthew 25:34, 40

“Is this not the fast which I choose, to loosen the bonds of wickedness, to undo the bands of the yoke, and to let the oppressed go free and break every yoke? “Is it not to divide your bread with the hungry and bring the homeless poor into the house; when you see the naked, to cover him; and not to hide yourself from your own flesh? Isaiah 58:6-7

14) Lukewarm people do whatever is necessary to keep themselves from feeling too guilty. They want to do the bare minimum, to be "good enough" without it requiring too much of them. They ask "How far can I go before it's considered a sin?" instead of "How can I keep myself pure as a temple of the Holy Spirit?" They ask, "How much do I have to give?" instead of "How much can I give?" They ask "How much time should I spend praying and reading my Bible?" instead of "I wish I didn't have to go to work, so I could sit here and read longer!"

But who am I, and who are my people, that we could give anything to you? Everything we have has come from you, and we give you only what you first gave us! 1 Chronicles 29:14

“The kingdom of heaven is like a treasure hidden in the field, which a man found and hid again; and from joy over it he goes and sells all that he has and buys that field. “Again, the kingdom of heaven is like a merchant seeking fine pearls, and upon finding one pearl of great value, he went and sold all that he had and bought it. Matthew 13:44-46

15) Lukewarm people are continually concerned with playing it safe; they are slaves to the god of control. This focus on safe living keeps them from sacrificing and risking for God.

Instruct those who are rich in this present world not to be conceited or to fix their hope on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly supplies us with all things to enjoy. Instruct them to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share, storing up for themselves the treasure of a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of that which is life indeed. 1 Timothy 6:17-19

And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell. Matthew 10:28

16) Lukewarm people feel secure because they attend church, made a profession of faith at age twelve, were baptized, come from a Christian family, vote Republican, or live in America. Just as the prophets in the Old Testament warned Israel that they were not safe just because they lived in the land of Israel, so we are not safe just because we wear the label Christian or because some people persist in calling us a "Christian nation."

Not everyone who calls out to me, 'Lord! Lord!' will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. Matthew 7:21

 “Woe to those who are at ease in Zion, and to those who feel secure on the mountain of Samaria, the notable men of the first of the nations, to whom the house of Israel comes! Amos 6:1

17) Lukewarm people do not live by faith; their lives are structured so they never have to. They don't have to trust God if something unexpected happens--they have their savings account. They don't need God to help them--they have their retirement plan in place. They don't genuinely seek out what life God would have them live--they have life figured and mapped out. They don't depend on God on a daily basis--their refrigerators are full and, for the most part, they are in good health. The truth is, their lives wouldn't look much different if they suddenly stopped believing in God.

And He told them a parable, saying, “The land of a rich man was very productive. “And he began reasoning to himself, saying, ‘What shall I do, since I have no place to store my crops?’ “Then he said, ‘This is what I will do: I will tear down my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. ‘And I will say to my soul, “Soul, you have many goods laid up for many years to come; take your ease, eat, drink and be merry.”’ “But God said to him, ‘You fool! This very night your soul is required of you; and now who will own what you have prepared?’ “So is the man who stores up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God.” Luke 12:16-21

18) Lukewarm people probably drink and swear less than average, but besides that, they really aren't very different from your typical unbeliever. They equate their partially sanitized lives with holiness, but they couldn't be more wrong.

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence. “You blind Pharisee, first clean the inside of the cup and of the dish, so that the outside of it may become clean also.
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. “So you, too, outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. Matthew 23:25-28

If you want to read more of Crazy Love by Francis Chan, click below to buy it. The entire book is encouraging and convicting. 

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

This Image Blows My Mind and 3 Reasons Why I'm in the Minority.

87% percent of all statistics are made up.

That may or may not be true. What is true is that is the percentage of Jews and Christians between the ages of 18-59 that say they would have sex before marriage.

I just need a moment to wrap my head around that...

Yeah, I can't. This image is from the State of Dating in America Report for 2014. It is a survey that is done by the two largest religious dating websites in the world: JDate.com and ChristianMingle.com.

There's two things that make me depressed about this image. Notice first the simple "Yes" section. It rose by 7% within a year. No being in love, no being in a serious, engaged relationship. Just "Yes, I would have sex before marriage."

The other is the "No" section. In 2013, only 15% of all 2,600 Christians and Jews who took this survey said "no" to premarital sex. Not just that, but the "No" section declined by 2% within a year! 13% is a mere 338 people out of 2,600.

I am in a very small majority in America. The startling thing to me now is that I don't have to look to America as whole to see myself in a minority, all I have to do is look among my "Christian" brothers and sisters. Many of the Christians who took this survey that checked any of the "Yes" boxes would quickly condemn homosexuals for being the ones who are ruining marriage.

I believe premarital sex is decimating the view of marriage across our nation. There are, of course, other things that destroy it as well, but premarital sex is the most predominate weapon.

Why do I believe this? Allow me to be honest: I've been on both sides of that image. At one time, I would have checked yes. Now, I would emphatically check no. But why?

1. Premarital sex is prohibited in the Bible.

This one is for all the Christians who would check yes on that survey. If you are a Christian, you have given yourself over to Christ as the Love and Lord of your life. His Word is where we are to draw our knowledge of how He deems fit for us to glorify Him. There are several verse dealing with this issue, but this is the one I hold most dear:

Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous. (Heb. 13:4)

The whole idea of an undefiled marriage bed is taken from the Old Testament. Anyone who has had sex before or outside of marriage has defiled the marriage bed and committed adultery. Those who do this will have to answer to the perfect and righteous Judge of the universe.

2. Premarital sex ruins the "specialness" of the wedding night. 

I'm not married yet, so I can't speak from personal experience. However, I have talked to several other people on this topic. Literally everyone I have talked to has said that they either wish they would have waited or they were so glad they waited. No one has told me, "I think having sex before our wedding really helped us in our marriage as a whole. If I could go back, I would do it exactly the same."

If a couple can't wait for their wedding night, then they have no true concern for their marriage. Waiting sets the tone of the rest of marriage. It says, "I want you to know that I will not settle. I want you and me to have the best marriage possible. I will put our best before my desires."

3. Premarital sex causes "two to become one" when they are not yet recognized as one.


I've been asked, "What exactly makes someone married?" This is an original argument so bare with me a second. We have to ask a few questions. Is marriage a wedding ceremony? Is it a piece of paper? Is it the word that defines two people's committed love to one another? Is it sex? I'm going to say D: All of the above. Marriage is more than a ceremony, more than a piece of paper, more than love, more than sex, etc. Yet marriage needs to not be less than these either.

Having parents, family, and friends confirm the marriage relationship is huge. When there is friction between the two families, life is hard for the newly weds. When none of their friends recommend they get married, social life can be tough. When the parents strongly disagree with their child's choice of a mate, then holidays could get tense.

What I'm saying is, having a moment in time where family and friends get together to recognize their support of a marriage is incredibly important to the years following the wedding. At that moment in time, all know and see them as "one flesh." They are recognized as one flesh by family and friends, not just themselves. This is why the pastor will say, "I now present you Mr. and Mrs. Josh Watford." Having sex makes two people "one flesh." This is to say that they connect on levels far deeper than just physical. This is a concept in Genesis, Jesus, and Paul. There's no way of escaping it.

Having sex is a much bigger commitment  than just saying, "I do." Those are just two words, but sex makes two people one person. But I want people to acknowledge Rebecca and me as one person before it actually happens.

I'm in the minority. I will continue to be in the minority. Looks like at this rate, the minority will keep getting smaller and smaller until waiting to have sex until marriage will be seen as ancient as arranged marriages. So pray with me. Pray that God will raise up a generation that will fight against the desecration of the marriage bed. Pray that they will be held and guide by the Holy Spirit. Pray that they can reach out in love to those who don't think the same way they do. Most of all, pray that even if this minority keeps getting smaller, God will keep a remnant faithful to Him and His Word.

What are some other reasons you would not have sex before marriage? Post in the comment section below.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Does God Exist?

If you haven't asked it, you will.

If you haven't answered it, you will have to.

Does God exist?

It is a question that I am glad people are asking. It means that people still care. It means that people understand the weight of the answer to this question. If yes, then there is responsibility that we have to Him. If no, then there is no such thing as a standard for truth, morality, love, justice, or basically any other virtue.

But I won't be getting into all of that quite yet. This will be the beginning of a series on Christian apologetics. I will be dealing with things like the existence of God, God and evil, Jesus' deity, how we got the Bible, and other very common questions about God and Christianity. Today I want to discuss one of the foundational arguments for God: the cosmological argument or Kalam argument. It simply states:
  1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
  2. The universe began to exist.
  3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
  4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
  5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.  
Now let's dive a little deeper into these premises.

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
This is the simple idea of "cause and effect." Everything that has ever been observed has had a cause. The only thing that has ever seriously challenged this theory has been quantum fluctuation. I am by no means a quantum physicist, but it is essentially a particle popping out of nothing. A particle will appear for a very small amount of time due to an increase of energy in a quantum vacuum. 

But the energy must have come from somewhere. The energy had to exist before we observed it in the quantum vacuum. In the case of the origin of the universe, nothing existed at all. Also, just because we do not know the cause of the energy does not mean that it doesn't have one.

This premise is intuitive and just makes sense. Look around you. Now go outside. Look around out there too. Does anything you see not have a cause? No. Your phone was built by the company that has its logo on it. That book on your desk was written by someone. The birds singing outside were given birth to. The noises you hear are caused by vibrations. The very fact that you can see and hear and understand these words are caused by several different parts of your body working together. Everything has come into existence had a cause.

 2. The universe began to exist.
This is a fairly new belief outside the religious sector. It was quickly embraced when first introduced and is now getting criticism again. Einstein's Theory of General Relativity made way for a belief that the universe had a beginning. Hubble's discovery and research of red shift gave even more evidence that there was a singular point in which space and time had started (that singularity, no matter how small, had to come from somewhere as well).

Opposing this premise, Stephen Hawking argues time is more like a sphere than a line. He states:
"Suppose the beginning of the universe was like the South Pole of the earth, with degrees of latitude playing the role of time. The universe would start as a point at the South Pole. As one moves north, the circles of constant latitude, representing the size of the universe, would expand. To ask what happened before the beginning of the universe would become a meaningless question, because there is nothing south of the South Pole."
He and others argue that the universe never began to exist, but it hasn't existed forever. In other words, he doesn't like the idea of the universe having a beginning or existing for infinity past, so he just doesn't believe either. This is not an option. His argument of a sphere has the same principles of a line. When you make your way around a sphere, you go in a line. So if time is a sphere, it still had a starting place, therefore the universe began to exist.

3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
If the first to premises are proven true, then the conclusion must be true. 

4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God. 
For something to cause everything that exists to exist it must not have ever come to exist. That's a tongue twister. What I mean is whatever the cause of the universe was, it had to be eternal. William Lane Craig gives some attributes of a universal cause. They are: "uncaused, beginningless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial..." He goes on to say it must be a "personal being endowed with freedom of will and enormous power. And that is a core concept of God."

This point may be the hardest to grasp of all the others. A "personal" cause? A cause with "freedom of will?" Hawking has trouble with seeing it this way. His M-theory attempts to explain the universe altogether. Part of that theory is the the sub-theory that gravity caused the universe. I do not have his book The Grand Design so I do not know word for word everything he discusses in it. However, he does discuss the belief that the universe created itself from nothing by using gravity. He is illogically saying, "X created X out of nothing." I'm sorry, but things just don't work that way. 

The idea of the cause being personal can get complicated to explain. In my research I found a beautifully simple quote by British physicist Edmund Whittaker. He explains it this way:  
 "There is no ground for supposing that matter (or energy, which is the same as matter) existed before this in an inert condition, and was in some way galvanised into activity at a certain instant: for what could have determined this instant rather than all the other instants of past eternity? It is simpler to postulate a creation ex nihilo, an operation of the Divine Will to constitute Nature from nothingness."
Why would the universe create itself? Did the universe in its infinitesimal state decide to start changing one day? If so, what caused that change? This cause had to be personal, not a force.
 
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God. 
End of story.

Well kind of.

One cannot deduct that this is the same God of the Bible. However, we will leave that for another. For now, rest in the fact that you are not by chance. You were not created by gravity. You were purposefully created by a personally God who has reason and chose to make you and the rest of the universe.
__________________________________________________________________________________

A few of the books that helped me with this blog were:

Buy them directly from here and enjoy!

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

What's Wrong with One of the Most Popular "Pro-Choice" Arguments?

Photo credit: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/oct/12/cancer-passed-from-mother-foetus
(Disclaimer: I don’t claim to fully understand the emotional anguish and life-altering psychological problems rape causes women. This post does not overlook them but attempts to keep them from getting even worse)

The statics have been quoted by almost everyone in every abortion debate ever.

1% of all abortions are from rape survivors.

Even though it is one one-hundredth of all abortions performed, it seems to be the most grey area of debate. Most people who consider themselves "pro-life" even believe abortion is okay when the woman is raped. The women who go through rape go through one of the most awful experiences this sinful world has to offer. I don’t want anyone to think I overlook that fact. The things I am about to say is because I love children and women, all while believing both have rights.

So what's wrong with this popular pro-abortion argument?  Killing children is killing children no matter how people try to rename or justify it.

Even well-known “pro-choice” advocates agree that the baby in the womb is a human being.

Some would argue that “the traumatic experience of rape may have left the individual with a mental health defect resulting in it being more humane for the mother to abort the baby.” This “mental health defect” is most likely depression or anxiety, which can be mild to severe.

Those are serious issues, but is abortion the cure of them? Does killing a child make the emotional effect of being raped better? How is murdering someone who had nothing to do with what happened supposed to keep the emotional toll from getting worse?

What if the woman decided to go through with the pregnancy, then decided the emotional effects were too strong, and killed the baby after he/she was born? The same child could have been legally killed just a few month before, so why not then? Because it is wrong to kill children no matter what kind of emotional stress they put on a woman.

Some argue the “pro-choice” argument, especially for rape victims. But think about why rape is wrong. The woman did not have a choice to have sex with the man or not. He forced something to happen to her that she did not want to happen. He didn’t ask. He didn’t give a choice.

Abortion is much more moral than rape because it gives the baby a choice, right? Right…?

David Platt argued against this idea of “pro-choice” in a recent sermon saying, “"You are not 'pro-choice' about rape… So why are you 'pro-choice' about killing children?"

I want justice to be served when a rapist attacks a woman. I want him in jail or dead, because of justice. The baby that is conceived because of the terrible act does not make the baby terrible. He/she should not be killed because of something they had nothing to do with. 

The "right" that a woman should exercise after a rape is pressing charges on the demented pervert who assaulted her, not sucking an innocent baby out of her womb piece by piece.

When a child is killed because he/she is the result of a rape, they are being treated like an STD. They are the unwanted effect of something that happened, therefore they must be terminated. Human life is not an STD, it is a gift from God. 

Every situation is different and I cannot say what a woman should do with her child once he/she is born. Rather, there are many options. 

1. Keep the child. This is the most ideal option. The child will come to know unconditional love from the mother.

2. Adoption. For those who feel the emotional effects of keeping a child that was a product of rape are too much, adoption is always an available option.

3. Foster Care. This can be a short-term or long-term option. Short-term could give the mother time to gather financial means to take care of the child or even give time to think about what it means to have a child.

Within all of these options, there are sub-categories of options like different kinds of custody for keeping the child and different types of adoptions. 

If you have been raped, seek counseling. At least talk to a friend or family member about it. Contact the police. Keeping it bottled up inside is the worst thing to do. Do not let this defeat you. Don't let the same man dominate you the rest of your life because of only a moment in time. But you can't rise above it all alone. 

The most important thing to remember if you have been raped is that you are still loved

What happened was not your sin. You had no say in what happened. God has not given up on you. 

The same goes for anyone who has had an abortion: you are still loved.

Jesus bore your penalty for the abortion. He loved you before He even made you, knowing that would happen. God has not given up on you.

God’s grace is sufficient to help anyone through anything; that even includes an unplanned pregnancy caused by raped.

Thursday, March 6, 2014

2 Reasons Men Should Shave Their Beard

 Beards are not a new thing.

They have been celebrated by most cultures around the world. You may go to any historical museum or see old paintings of men, and most have burly beards and choppy sideburns that would get the average business man today fired. Men today oh and ah over the manliness of these manly men with manly beards.

So what's wrong with the beard?

Yeah, you're right. Nothing is wrong with beards.

Rather, it is an ideology that goes along with having a beard that I am concerned with.

There has been a recent resurgence of facial hair growth. It has been happening mainly among hipsters and younger men for a few years. Recently with Duck Dynasty, I am personally beginning to see more older men growing their beards out now. So across the board there is more and more men growing beards out?

Why?

Let me restate this: there is nothing wrong with beards. I grow mine out periodically. Beards are fine, but are they only a fashion statement or more than that?

Some men, I am afraid, find their identity in their beards. 

So, here are my two reasons men should shave their beards off.

1. To prove that you are a man and a beard is not what defines that fact.

Some men think having a beard makes them a man.

I believe this because I am picked on almost every time I shave my face clean. I know the jokes are only that, but they are spurred on by something. I would not receive jokes about having a clean face unless there was not something telling these other men that beards are a sign of masculinity.

God defines masculinity and no where in the Bible does it say that in order to be a man, you must have facial hair. (Side note: the command in Leviticus to not shave the beard or edges of the hair was strictly for ceremonial purposes and not defining masculinity).

2. To prove that you are more interesting than your beard.

Everyone I know that has a beastly beard get compliments on it all the time. They love the attention and it's a conversation piece. "Man, how long has it taken you to grow that out?" "Do you hide animals in that thing?" "How do you get a job with it?"

Some guys simply think it makes them cool. 

No. What you look like doesn't make you cool or interesting. Are more than just beard deep?

What's your personality like? If you think your personality is defined by how much hair you have on your face, then you have no personality.

Are beards bad? Of course not! Should you find your identity in them? Absolutely not. I challenge then men who have not shaven in a very long time to go baby-faced. For the simple fact of proving to yourself and the world that you can be an interesting, masculine man without it. 

After you shave it, then let the beardfest begin again! Because then you will know that you have a beard, not that the beard has you. 

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Why the Gospel is Good News: The Substituted Messiah

This is part four in the series. Check out the first, second, and third parts as well.
**************************************************************************************************

I’m a ninja.

Okay, I’m not. Even if I was I couldn’t tell you. Or would I?

I can prove I’m a ninja. I can kill flies. Applaud me, I know you want to.

But what is the consequence of killing a fly? I may be (or may not be) a ninja who kills flies all the time, but who is going to punish me for murder? All I do is slap them and they die. Who will come to my house, arrest me, take me to court, and give me a sentence? No one. Not even PETA.

What would happen if I slapped a dog? PETA may get involved now, but still no outstanding punishment.

Now what if I slapped a child? There’s going to be an angry mom! Then I may only get child abuse, which looks really bad on my record (plus I’d lose my job as a minister).

Even more than that, what if I slapped one of the most important men on earth, President Obama? I didn’t ask if you wanted me to slap him or not, I’m just saying. I would get a much terrible punishment than all of the previous. Slapping him is a much bigger deal than slapping the common house fly.

Why? I’m doing the exact same thing, so why don’t I get the same punishment for them all?

The punishment of an action is determined by the value of the one offended.

A fly is not worth much, therefore my punishment is minimal. President Obama is one of the most valuable people on the planet (whether you see him as that or not), therefore any offense against him is liable of one of the most harsh punishments on the planet.

What if you have rebelled against, slandered, blasphemed, and metaphorically slapped the most valuable and worthy Being in the entire universe? That’s an important question, because you have.

“... all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:23).

All. Every last person on earth who has ever lived. Every king, every peasant, every banker, every farmer, every prostitute, every preacher, every teacher, every, insurance salesman. All.

Every person has committed the greatest crime in the entire universe: rebelling against the most valuable Being.

Since God is eternally worthy, our punishment is just and right to be eternally severe. If God was but a mere human or dog or fly, then an eternal punishment is unjust and morally wrong.

God is also the most perfect judge, and He will judge all things and all people with perfect justice. That is scary.

Let’s say you get a really bad speeding ticket. I have gotten a few myself (I will not disclose how many), so I know they are awful. You go to court because you don’t have enough money to pay it. The judge looks at you and says, “You can either pay up now, or go to jail.” Those are your only two choices because this judge is just and knows that justice must be served. If he simply let you go, he would be unjust. You may want him to be unjust, but what if that person before him was Osama bin Laden? Would you want the judge to be unjust to him? Both of you broke the law and justice must be served for both.

God is even more just and righteous than this judge. So why would He allow injustice to rule as law? He will not and does not.

But what if someone stepped up behind you and gave the judge the exact amount you owed him?

That’s what Jesus did: He took our place on the cross.

“...[all] are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith” (Rom. 3:24-25a).

He paid the payment we could never pay. An invaluable price was paid to fulfill the insurmountable debt that we owed to an infinitely worthy God.  What you owed God was so much that it would take eternity to bring justice to it’s fullness. 
Saying that God made Christ a propitiation simply means that Christ took our penalty. All the wrath (penalty for sin) that was due us, He bore for us. Romans 5:9 says that Jesus saved us from the “wrath of God.” Justice had to be served, yet while we were still sinners, God made a way.

“This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus” (Rom. 3:25b-26).

At the cross, God shows His justice and love at the same time. God the Father could not just let sins go unpunished. So God the Son stepped in and said “I will become sin for them so that in me they might become the righteousness of God” (paraphrase of 2 Cor. 5:21). Jesus swallowed up sin and all of it’s penalties for the one who is in Him, meaning those who have faith in Him.

So for those reading this who have not placed your faith in Christ to take away the eternal penalty that is due, trust in Him today. He is Savior and Lord. He is the Great I Am, the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. He is salvation. He is the “Lamb of God who takes 
away the sins of the world!”

And that is good news.
************************************************************************************************** 

Here are a few books that helped me with this blog. Check them out and add them to your library!